Showing posts with label BritishFilm. Show all posts
Showing posts with label BritishFilm. Show all posts

04 April 2015

#WTW: The Trip; The Trip to Italy

(#WhatThomWatched number twenty-one, or, how you say, il numero ventuno)


The Trip and The Trip to Italy

(2010/2014, Michael Winterbottom; Streaming via Netflix)


It’s not a particularly original or internet-shaking insight to observe that genius, groundbreaking actor/comedian/writer/chameleon Steve Coogan does not get enough love, especially in the United States. Considering that he often plays characters very like himself, and sometimes “himself” as one or more variant characters, and that these variant Steve Coogans are very vocal about the lack of Coogan appreciation, a lack of recognition is built into many of his performances. While his long string of innovative BBC radio and television programs and his recurring characters started this — notably Alan Partridge in The Day Today, Knowing Me Knowing You, and I’m Alan Partridge 
— his long partnership with director Michael Winterbottom on films like Tristram Shandy: A Cock and Bull Story and The Look of Love has added to the complexity. Coogan’s varied projects demonstrate both his ability to completely disappear into character (Coogan’s Run, Dr. Terrible’s House of Horrible), play “himself” (Tristram Shandy and the Trip movies), or both (24 Hour Party People, where he expertly becomes rock promoter Tony Wilson, but not before an opening scene where he addresses the camera to explain that he’s an actor, Steve Coogan, playing Wilson.)





Winterbottom and Coogan clearly sit round the pub plotting new ways to mess with the fourth wall. In that spirit, they started a BBC2 series in 2010, purportedly a straight-up celebrity-hosted lifestyle show, in which Coogan and British standup comic Rob Brydon drive together in a rental, stay in beautiful towns in England and Europe, and eat and drink at fine restaurants, supposedly as guest reporters for The Observer checking out the wine, dining, and accommodations. But of course we don’t get the real Coogan and Brydon; instead, Coogan plays a bitter, conceited actor and Brydon his put-upon comedian pal. Or not; as Brydon puts it when asked if the two are friends: “No. We work together.”




The original television series (in which they travel to England’s North Country) comprised six 30-minute episodes; in 2014 a second series (a road trip in Italy) added six more. In each case, Winterbottom also shaped the material into an under-two-hour theatrical movie, with the six “days” of each trip signified by title cards. The two men are seen driving a rental car together, checking into inns (at which Coogan is always angling for the better room), eating a meal prepared by their host’s kitchen, and, at the end of each day, falling asleep in their beds, sometimes alone, sometimes with a companion. They also sample many of the towns’ local culture, most often the graves of famous British writers (Italy is the resting place for Shelley) and the towns where they worked (Lord Byron lived in Italy for most of his working life). Stunning, large-scale shots of landscapes and intricate close-ups of food preparation round out the movies’ visuals; the soundtracks are exclusively classical, with new music by Michael Nyman or (in Italy) classic works by Strauss or Mahler.






So with this as their basis, the two compilation movies stand or fall on a couple of things: First, to what degree Winterbottom shaped the television episodes’ looser material into an arc that carries weight — emotional or thematic, since there’s very little narrative to work with. And, of course, how funny the conversation is between the two rivals.


Brydon is a very successful comic within Britain, a regular on the talk-show circuit, with an endless stream of impressions (here he’s particularly locked on Michael Caine and Sean Connery). He has a famous bit called “Small Man in a Box” which causes old ladies to approach him on the street for autographs. The Brydon-character here is portrayed as a man aware of his limitations and unsure of his ability to carry a real acting role; when he is given a chance to put an audition on tape for a possible character role in an American movie, he worries that he’s unable to actually act without slipping into an impersonation. Coogan is fully tuned in to Brydon’s insecurity and pokes at him every chance he gets; the Coogan-character considers himself a true actor who has done exemplary work in both British and American movies but who is constantly denied the fame he deserves. He never fails to put Brydon down and sneer at Brydon’s constant, reflexive efforts to be funny — except, in a brilliant repeated conceit, Coogan can’t stop himself from competing with Brydon. Watching the two of them trying to school the other in an impression is hysterical; a lengthy scene where they try to fine-tune the classic James Bond supervillain Blofeld is incredible (and has its own following as a YouTube clip): “Come come, Mr. Bond . . . .”




As for Coogan, where Brydon can’t turn off the hail-fellow-well-met entertainer, Coogan is the perpetual autodidact, spouting endless facts about everything they encounter, and correcting any offering from Brydon or anyone else. The highlight of Trip is his encounter with another traveller doing the same thing; after Coogan has annoyed Brydon to the point where he’s been left to stomp off alone, he is forced to back away himself as a stranger tries to regale him with more facts about history. Both men also have a series of dreams (Coogan’s in Trip; Brydon’s in Italy) that reinforce their insecurities; Coogan dreams of having Ben Stiller as an agent, telling him all of the top-ranked American directors who are desperate to work with him; when Coogan rejects “P. T. Anderson, Wes Anderson” as “auteurs,” dream-Stiller smoothly slips to mainstream directors: “The Scotts. Tony and Ridley. They both want to work with you.” Meanwhile, Brydon has a dream of performing a dramatic role in a Godfather-esque film with perfect pathos and delivery; as his dream-self mutters over how to say a line in Italian, we see that he’s gutted Coogan as Vito Corleone.



A question of the travellers’ authenticity hangs over most of their experiences. Lots of the dinner scenes feature their frozen, polite stares as a waiter explains the dishes that have been prepared for them, followed by an awkward “Thanks!”; they don’t seem to have any qualifications to judge the wines or cuisine. They clearly crave connection to the historical sites they visit, usually to the great English authors; they carry around a thick compilation of Wordsworth and (at one point) are reading William Hazlitt’s capsule biographies (from the 1800’s) of writers, “The Spirit of the Age.” But as with so many of us today, they mostly settle for cell-phone selfies in front of various graves or preserved garrets. In addition to endless fights about actors, they spend a large part of Italy discussing the artistic and lasting merits of Alanis Morissette’s “Jagged Little Pill” (coincidentally relevant at this writing, as the album reaches the 20th anniversary of its release). At the same time that they are creating these ersatz portraits and pop-culture theories, Winterbottom sometimes seems to ironically compose them or their surroundings in ways that mirror artworks, without their conscious acknowledgement.



Reminds me of:


The Trip films are “long-form conversation movies” like My Dinner With Andre or the Before trilogy; or Certified Copy (which also happens to share a lot of the visual grammar! though instead of geography as a map of a marriage, here the vistas, bedrooms, and graveyards seem more tied to aging and a loss of male potency).



Distinct from the two-handed dialogue these are also road-trip films, of which there have certainly been many: I haven’t seen Il Sorpasso yet, but the ones I’ve watched involve couples squabbling their way to love (It Happened One Night, The Sure Thing) or couples falling out of love (Two For the Road) or weirdoes finding common ground (Melvin and Howard, Thelma and Louise). As for the Trip version, I don’t think there are better examples of a realistic (read: antagonistic) male friendship. There’s nary a hint of “bromance”; maybe this level of unpleasantness and mistreatment of each other is exactly right as a depiction of performer coworkers. They’ve passed any need for affirmations or close inquiry; instead of affection the proof of their connectedness is their deep need to make the other laugh. This happens on occasion but at regular intervals; after affecting stone-faced disapproval for most of the other’s forays, broken often by attempts to top or outfox them, they suddenly slip into a bit that they have discovered together like old comedy partners. When this happens the mutual approval is palpable; instead of one-upmanship, they are supporting each other’s best efforts.





But then — the guilt!


Still haven’t watched Coogan’s Saxondale. I own it, though.



Pitch:

Both films choose to end on melancholy notes; the first narrative hangs on Coogan’s loneliness and unhappiness and winds up with a perfect coda between Brydon and his baby daughter, with his wife, in their kitchen. So the second is particularly heartbreaking as Brydon seems to have used the out-of-country trip as an opportunity to drift into an affair; as he worries about what he might have lost, he is watching Coogan reconnect with his teenage son. Yet in fact all of these details — the wife, baby, son, and all other relationships — are scripted, played by actors, and are in no way related to the real Brydon or Coogan. That’s the deep game that Winterbottom and his collaborators are playing.

11 January 2015

#WTW Glance: The Imitation Game

#WhatThomWatched Glance*: 


The Imitation Game




(Morten Tyldum, 2014; In theaters/Disc release details not yet announced)




Recommended for: People interested in cryptography, and/or World War II, and/or British biopics — and/or Benedict Cumberbatch.)

Although there have been a couple high-profile movie treatments of seminal cryptographer and father of the modern computer Alan Turing (most notably Breaking the Code from 1996, with Derek Jacobi as Turing, and based on the same source material), The Imitation Game is really the first attempt to fully address both Turing’s contributions to World War II and his illicit life as a gay man in 1940’s England. Benedict Cumberbatch excels at portraying Turing’s social awkwardness and preternatural intelligence alike; there are also excellent roles for his real-life codebreaking team at Bletchley Park including Keira Knightley as a mathematician determined to operate outside the societal restraints imposed on women. It’s handsomely produced, intelligently written, and well-paced, but beyond being a simple prestige picture it also shows a very specific and shameful example of historical intolerance for homosexuality, in a clear and straightforward way.





Reminds me of:



Other well-made British-cast British-subject biopics — though I don’t usually get into “standard” biopics over the new-school versions from directors like Michael Winterbottom, who seem determined to upend conventions (cf. his depictions of Tony Wilson in 24 Hour Party People, or Mariane and Daniel Pearl in A Mighty Heart). This one has a few of the trite, old melodrama beats and is not terribly faithful to the historical Turing. But I was still impressed at the larger statement it was able to make about Turing’s sexual preference and the way his work could stand in more than one metaphorical way for his personhood and his struggles. I’m pleased to read about scholarship which indicates that his actual life may not have been nearly as abject as what we see here, but at the same time Tyldum and screenwriter Graham Moore have made creative choices which allow Turing to represent much more than just himself; after all, as we learn from a post-film credit, 49,000 other people in Britain were also convicted of gross indecency. The Turing Test is a powerful metaphor for the coded lives these men and women had to lead.



As it happens, in my ongoing (and slow) quest to read everything by Neal Stephenson, I’d recently finished his excellent Cryptonomicon from 1999. This semi-historical novel includes several real Bletchley Park (and rival) codebreakers, among them a far cheerier rendition of Turing. Stephenson also goes light years beyond the complications presented in this film; the final stage of Imitation Game, where the disinformation campaigns begin to kick into gear, is the starting point of the book which (in addition to loads more guns, sex, and haiku) has a much higher level of complexity. For anyone primarily interested in the cryptography problems of advanced warfare, I recommend Stephenson.



But then — the guilt!




As effective as it may be, the movie's still not the accurate story of what happened or what Turing or the Bletchley Park crew did. Showing “science” (or any higher-order creativity) on-screen in ways that audiences respond to is really hard. But as viewers, we should continue to push filmmakers and other artists to do the work and turn these concepts into forms that we can experience and understand. The movie that somehow manages to embody the actual innovative leaps of a Turing (or an Einstein, or a Van Gogh, or a Mozart) and make an audience feel them will be a marvel. (I put this in the BTTG section because I can't readily think of a successful example. Chaim Potok's My Name is Asher Lev is the best parallel I can come up with; in that case a book somehow fully embodies and passes on to the reader the experience of painting, in three incredible pages. I haven’t seen Ed Harris’s Pollock — maybe that captures a similar creative moment in cinematic form? Well, if a movie example comes to me, I won't cheat and edit out my admissions here — I'll post it below in the comments. Feel free to contribute your own!)

Pitch:


Knightley and Cumberbatch's scene together where she denounces his clumsy attempts to push her away is an impressive one — she’s doing a lot of emotional work with a small set of lines.

*For movies and shows which are current — in theaters or streaming — I'm posting a short, less-spoilery take on #WhatThomWatched (and generally only when something really strikes me as worth passing on). These shorter essays are labeled Glance.



28 December 2014

#WTW: Shallow Grave

(#WhatThomWatched seven....)


Shallow Grave

(Danny Boyle, 1994; Criterion spine 616)




#WTW Shallow Grave: MatesThe three primary characters in Shallow Grave, the great Danny Boyle’s (and writer John Hodge’s) first theatrical film, are as unlikable as they come; many read Ewan McGregor’s character as having earned some kind of redemption at the end, but the alternative view that each horrible flatmate deserves exactly what he or she gets (or doesn’t get) seems most credible (people may simply be seduced by McGregor’s laughing blue eyes, and who can blame them?) Boyle’s deployment of minimal resources deserves to be studied as an exemplar of how low-budget can be stylish to a fault. The taut 90-minute story is as simple as can be: three young professional friends take in a fourth roomer who immediately turns up dead, leaving a suitcase of cash. How the friends deal with the body, the money, and each other comprises the rest of the film. You fully expect alliances to form and shift, and some players to be more mentally and emotionally capable than others, but the actual paths those shifts take is unpredictable and exciting. Loud, splashy events occur, as both police and a terrifying pair of remorseless killers close in on the money, but it’s equally rewarding to follow the adjusting mental states of the friends when paranoia sets in, visible through their narrowing eyes and behind their tight expressions.


#WTW Shallow Grave: Color

#WTW Shallow Grave: The reveal












Reminds me of:


#WTW Shallow Grave: Phantom ride
Trainspotting, inevitably; that crawling troll doll (first in the overindulgence montage and later in McGregor’s nightmares) seems directly transported to Renton’s drug trips and a similar baby doll. And having recently watched the Mark Cousins documentary series The Story of Film, my antennae were up for the opening “phantom ride” shots; sped-up footage from a camera mounted on a car streaking through Edinburgh, evoking something out-of-control that might be going on behind the staid rows of Scottish flats. It’s a striking touch that doesn’t immediately connect to the following scene — turns out the rider is just a nice boring bloke who is answering an ad for a room — but once we begin to understand the sick game that our three heroes are playing with him (and many other hopefuls), the visual starts to make sense.




#WTW Shallow Grave: Game




Speaking of visual connections — albeit ones that are clearly coincidental and specific to #WTW! — having just posted images for Youth of the Beast, I couldn’t help but notice scenes with Kerry Fox that evoked it, both the tower of champagne glasses and (more viciously) the point of her black shoe threateningly pushing on McGregor’s chest after he’s fallen on the dance floor — of course that move is aggressively seductive in Grave, but the unintended echo left it tasting perverse and violent.

#WTW Shallow Grave: Youth?

#WTW Shallow Grave: Beast?













(And to give the final actor in the trio his (geek-out) due: Christopher Eccleston is phenomenal here as an easily damaged milquetoast . . . . and, yes, it had to come out sooner or later — I’m a Doctor Who fan (both old and Nu), and Eccleston is far and above my favorite Doctor of the modern series.)
#WTW Shallow Grave: Not a sonic.


But also — the guilt!

I don’t like (or get) Slumdog Millionaire, or at least I didn’t when it came out — maybe I’ll give it another chance, someday, but I’ve got several other Boyle films to see first: Millions, his lightly comedic take on a similar found-money setup; or certainly Sunshine, or last year’s Trance.

There’s some controversy among the fans about the ending — not about its quality, but about whether events occur exactly as shown, or if we’re meant to understand that the literal action is an ironic counterpoint to reality. I must report that Boyle’s commentary on the Criterion disk gives a definitive answer and that it’s not the one I would personally prefer. I’m sure this is my (true?) cynical self coming out, but I prefer a worldview where none of these characters gets an out. I might just choose to read my own implications into the final scene even in the face of authorial intent. (Hmmph; between this and the admission about the Ninth Doctor above I may have just lost half my audience — that’s a whole one of you!)


#WTW Shallow Grave: Things get complicated.
#WTW Shallow Grave: Things get nasty.


#WTW Shallow Grave: Things get sticky.












Pitch:

I get creepy-crawly (in the best way) as McGregor climbs up into the unfinished attic space and we see what Eccelston and his efforts have wrought there — I won’t spoil it with a picture. Is it strictly realistic? I don’t think it is, or has to be. To me it’s a perfect example of art direction used to create a film image in service to the story (and to the mental states of its characters) without necessarily being literal. One thing is sure — more movies should pay this much attention to their look.